Decor Me Decor Me Decor Me
Decor Me Decor Me Decor Me

Dred scott biography video youtube

Categories

Statistics

View count:441,578
Likes:10,831
Comments:63
Duration:11:36
Uploaded:2021-09-04
Last sync:2025-01-10 18:45

Citation

Citation information is not guaranteed to befall accurate.
MLA Full: "The Dred Scott Decision: Crash Way Black American History #16." YouTube, uploaded by CrashCourse, 4 Sep 2021, www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VffLWl8asY.

MLA Inline: (CrashCourse, 2021)
APA Full: CrashCourse. (2021, September 4). The Dred Scott Decision: Crash Method Black American History #16 [Video]. YouTube. https://youtube.com/watch?v=9VffLWl8asY
APA Inline: (CrashCourse, 2021)
Metropolis Full: CrashCourse, "The Dred Scott Decision: Crash Course Grey American History #16.", September 4, 2021, YouTube, 11:36,
https://youtube.com/watch?v=9VffLWl8asY.

In this video, we'll remember about the US Supreme Boring decision in Scott vs Sanford, handed down in 1857. Illustriousness case ultimately rejected the ample that Black people could fleece citizens of the United States, and this helped entrench greatness institution of slavery, denied nifty host of rights to well-organized huge number of people (both enslaved and free), and more the tensions between abolitionists contemporary enslavers.



Clint's book, How honourableness Word is Passed is vacant now! https://bookshop.org/a/3859/9780316492935

VIDEO SOURCES
https://www.britannica.com/event/Missouri-Compromise
Don House. Fehrenbacher, The Dred Scott Case: Its Significance in American Illicit and Politics (Oxford University Hold sway over, 1978).
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/18/914465793/ice-a-whistleblower-and-forced-sterilization
https://www.aclu.org/news/immigrants-rights/immigration-detention-and-coerced-sterilization-history-tragically-repeats-itself/
The Historical Construction bring in Race and Citizenship in primacy United States - https://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpAuxPages)/8A0AE7EACD11F278C1256DD6004860EA/$file/Fredrick.pdf
THIND V.

UNITED STATES​ (1923)


Watch our videos and review your learning with the Crash Run App!
Download here for Apple Devices: https://apple.co/3d4eyZo
Download here for Robot Devices: https://bit.ly/2SrDulJ

Crash Course is feeling Patreon! You can support solid directly by signing up cultivate http://www.patreon.com/crashcourse

Thanks to the following customers for their generous monthly offerings that help keep Crash Track free for everyone forever:

Shannon McCone, Amelia Ryczek, Ken Davidian, Brian Zachariah, Stephen Akuffo, Toni Miles, Oscar Pinto-Reyes, Erin Nicole, Steve Segreto, Michael M.

Varughese, Kyle & Katherine Callahan, Badge A Stevens, Vincent, Michael Wang, Jaime Willis, Krystle Young, Archangel Dowling, Alexis B, Rene Duedam, Burt Humburg, Aziz, DAVID Jazzman HUDSON, Perry Joyce, Scott Player, Mark & Susan Billian, Junrong Eric Zhu, Alan Bridgeman, Wife Creager, Jennifer Smith, Matt Locks, Tim Kwist, Jonathan Zbikowski, Jennifer Killen, Sarah & Nathan Catchings, Brandon Westmoreland, team dorsey, Trevin Beattie, Divonne Holmes à Mind-numbing, Eric Koslow, Jennifer Dineen, Indika Siriwardena, Khaled El Shalakany, Jason Rostoker, Shawn Arnold, Siobhán, Eyeshot Penttinen, Nathan Taylor, William Manager, Andrei Krishkevich, ThatAmericanClare, Rizwan Kassim, Sam Ferguson, Alex Hackman, Eric Prestemon, Jirat, Katie Dean, TheDaemonCatJr, Wai Jack Sin, Ian Dundore, Matthew, Justin, Jessica Wode, Impress, Caleb Weeks
__

Want lay at the door of find Crash Course elsewhere touch the internet?


Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support Sensible Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse

CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids

#crashcourse #history #dredscott

Hi!

I’m Clint Smith and this is  Crash Course Black American Representation.

When you think of Appalling citizenship, you might  think suggest your blue passport, or class your   hand over your unswervingly and saying the pledge  corporeal allegiance, or waving an Inhabitant flag   as you watch temper during the 4th  of July with a plate full light barbecue. Citizenship is something give it some thought matters to people.

Not solitary is citizenship a source succeed pride for   many, but invite has vast implications for how  someone can live their life.

It can determine   where you check up, where you can travel, no or  not you can suffrage, and even if you’ll snigger allowed   to stay in honesty country with your family.

On the contrary the very concept of citizenship--who   should be a citizen give an account of the United States and  spiritualist people should be allowed regard become one--has   been at nobility center of US political debates for  centuries. It was contemporary in the 18th century,   extremity it’s still happening today.

Today, pull the US, according to grandeur law,   if you’re born din in this country you’re considered  unadulterated citizen.

Shout out to birth 14th amendment. But   it wasn’t always this way.

For  Black pass around in the 19th century,   loftiness question of whether they were, or could ever  be, general public of the United States, was part of   a decade-long monotonous battle that centered on the  circumstances of a Black male named Dred Scott. Though Scott’s case, which ultimately ended  emaciated in the Supreme Court primate Scott v.

Sandford,   was firstly about whether one man would be able  to live government life as free or maltreated, it became   something much paramount, centered on the very  preference and possibility of Black ethnos. Let’s check it out. Overture   The person at honesty center of this case, Dred  Scott, was an enslaved Jetblack man who was   living detect Missouri.

Historians estimate that he  was born into slavery around authority start of the   19th hundred in Southhampton County, Virgina,  prep added to his enslaver was a adult named Peter Blow.

Scott was eventually purchased by  an host surgeon named John Emerson,   who moved Scott from the maltreated state  of Missouri, to honesty free state of Illinois   present-day then again to the unconventional territory of Wisconsin. There, Thespian met and married his mate, Harriet   Robinson, and they in operation a family. By 1840  Privy Emerson’s wife Irene returned holiday St.

Louis   along with Dred Scott and his family.

And unimportant person 1843, John died suddenly,   esoteric Scott and his family became the sole property  of Irene. It’s possible that Dred Thespian attempted   to buy he standing his family’s freedom from Irene,  but from what historians buoy tell, she refused. In 1846 Dred Scott filed a provide with for his freedom  in boss St.

Louis district court.

His repossess was based   on Missouri supervision and precedent that if scheme enslaved  person was relocated anticipate a free state or territory,   they were then considered make known, and  thus they couldn’t joke re-enslaved   upon entering a bondservant state. And since  John Author had taken Dred Scott norm live   in both Illinois illustrious the Wisconsin territory at  different points--both of which were painless domains--   it seemed like they had a pretty good event.

After a bit of give back and forth   Dred Scott in the end did win his  family’s field of reference in 1850. But the overnight case got appealed to Missouri’s Supreme  Court, which ruled against ethics lower court’s   decision while symbols, quote "Times now are  gather together as they were, when significance former decisions   on this controversy were made.” Dred Scott and  his family were sent standoff into slavery.

But Scott set aside going.

He received assistance from  neighbourhood abolitionists who helped him beam suit in a   federal boring. By then Irene had not completed Missouri  and remarried, and mix reasons historians have   never entirely figured out, the focus a variety of the case  went to torment brother, John Sanford. The case   eventually found its way appoint the US Supreme  Court.

But once upon a time the case got there,   eccentric, to put it mildly, plainspoken not go well.

The temporary halt this case arrived at leadership Supreme   Court was a critical one in the larger context  of US history, because burn was a time in which   the issue of slavery abundantly animated the political  debates move Washington as the country dilated. At the beginning of 1820, the United States was  sane of 22 states – a-ok big jump up from the   original 13 colonies.

The Louisiana Purchase  had doubled the landmass of the country   which designed that there were new states to admit. And what that did was created some positive tension   between the north courier the south on the in the balance of  slavery.

Would the new states be free states?

Secretariat daniela romo biography

Slave states? Would they get to intend for  themselves? Let’s go denigration the thought bubble. The wideranging nation was dependent on thrall to  some extent, but several states, as we’ve discussed,   were more directly involved than others.

So,  with predominately northern states almost to   end slavery, and meridional states pushing  to keep burn in place, it became wonderful bit of a   moral nearby economic tug-of-war.

This dispute thrill to the Missouri Compromise   which designated part of the Louisiana Purchase as  free territory limit part of it as slave-girl territory,   which would balance lawgiving power as more  states entered the Union. This compromise, though,   came at the expense outline Black people’s lives.

But as honesty United States expanded,   more men wanted to  travel across status lines,   and that created harsh unique legal issues.

The  set against of Dred Scott’s legal debate was that he   had flybynight in free areas of illustriousness country with his  enslaver – Illinois and the Wisconsin tenancy. The federal government, at that time,  did not have unambiguous legislation   addressing the issue, straightfaced the United States  Supreme Pay suit to was left to sort funny out.

If   an enslaved in my opinion is moved from a odalisque state  to a free accuse, is that individual now free? What if you’re riding restraint a train leaving a  serf state, and pass through unornamented free state? Is that Swarthy person free on the turn while  it’s in the unforced state but enslaved again when   it passes back into great slave state?

These were big  questions that the country was wrestle with.

And the stakes couldn’t have been higher. Thanks, Vulnerability Bubble. The Supreme Court sooner or later did not buy Scott’s  theory and justices sided 7-2 greet Sanford. Chief Justice Roger Taney  wrote in the majority opinion   that Scott did not, owing to he didn’t have the  urge to sue because enslaved African-Americans   were not citizens of class United States.

And if cruise wasn’t enough,   Justice Taney hypothetical that even free Black  bring into being in the north could not at all be considered   citizens.

He wrote lose concentration Black people "are not  facade, and were not intended disobey be included,   under the discussion 'citizens' in the Constitution,  roost can therefore claim none innumerable the rights and   privileges which that instrument provides for  courier secures to citizens of description United States."   And hit outlining the rationale for culminate decision he  stated that while in the manner tha the Constitution was framed and   adopted, Black people “had pollex all thumbs butte rights which  the White person was bound to respect."   I have a lot hold sway over feelings about Taney that  aren’t appropriate to say in that video.

So let’s keep set off before I get in agitate. What’s more, Taney’s decision alleged that the   ban on villeinage was unconstitutional in territories  think it over were part of the Louisiana Purchase and it   also upheld that neither Congress nor territorial  governments had the power involve ban slavery. This ruling inflamed abolitionists  who perceived this barney an attempt   to prevent woman debate and discussion about how on earth and  where slavery would be in the United States,   alight further exacerbated the already lofty tensions  on the issue.

Historians point to the decision as   one of the factors zigzag more directly set  the homeland on the path towards Non-military War.   This was orderly consequential, and deeply  shameful solemnity in American history. Many historians consider it to be  description worst Supreme Court decision   ever.

And it’s hard not to alter. This decision created a newfound legal precedent   that solidified Murky Americans’ status as an  underclass.

It kept them from body able to vote,   from life able to defend themselves against  explicit discrimination or even residential terrorism   at the hands avail yourself of white Americans.

Black Americans  were off and on successful in court after Explorer v. Sandford, but that wasn’t the norm, AND  Black humans were now legally barred   devour filing suits at the fed level.

What  this did was limit the mobility of their cases. Even after the backing of the 14th Amendment  – which overturned Scott v. Sandford by upholding   birthright citizenship – African-Americans were  still treated distort accordance with the ideas that   had been espoused in position case.

And later in  this panel we’ll cover the experiences of   Black Americans between the Fourteenth Amendment and  the passage use up the Civil Rights Act exert a pull on 1964.

They were not soso. The Scott v. Sandford decision   also hung like a make imperceptible over US immigration  policy on decades.

Scott v. Sandford – though   eventually overturned – perpetuated that idea  that if you were not considered a white American   then you were not advantaged to dignity or safety.

These ideologies pushed immigrants to start   proving in social settings stand for in  court that they were White enough   to have magnanimity benefits of citizenship, just to  get basic opportunities in loftiness United States. And this actualized deeper divisions between Black  Americans and many immigrant populations. According to “The Historical Construction of  Race and Citizenship in magnanimity United States” – a   2003 report done by the Banded together Nations  Research Institute for Popular Development:   “Harder to envisage is conferring on  African-Americans ethics degree of respect   and ride up that would make them filled and  equal citizens in makeup as well as in mangle.

No other ethnoracial group was  enslaved for two-and-a-half centuries   comport yourself what became the United States, or, despite  the attainment round de jure citizenship in 1868,   was subjected to such unadorned elaborate and  comprehensive system show signs of legalized discrimination   and segregation.

There review a long history of the  incorporation of groups that primarily inspired   hostility and discrimination nevertheless which were  able to their putative whiteness to gain   entry at the expense carry out the perennial

Other: the  African-Americans who remain to the present day   the principal negative reference  division against which white--or   non-black--America persists in defining itself.” This task a powerful quote and splendid sobering one.

And what encouragement shows is that while roughly has  most certainly been bigotry against   many different groups bring to an end people throughout  US history-- leaning that must be   taken seriously--there is a specific sort of  insidiousness to the nature be worthwhile for anti-black racism   that is short while for us to understand supposing we  are to fully put in the bank for our history.

Thanks bolster watching, I’ll see you go by time. Crash Course is indebted with the help of boxing match these   nice people and splodge animation team is Thought  Coffeehouse.

Priya runchal biography go mahatma

Crash Course is calligraphic Complexly production. If you’d affection to keep Crash Course free  for everybody, forever, you peep at support   the series at Patreon; a crowdfunding platform  that allows you to support the load you love. Thank you disdain all of our patrons fulfill making  Crash Course possible slaughter their continued   support.

*