Dred scott biography video youtube
Categories
Statistics
View count: | 441,578 |
Likes: | 10,831 |
Comments: | 63 |
Duration: | 11:36 |
Uploaded: | 2021-09-04 |
Last sync: | 2025-01-10 18:45 |
Citation
Citation information is not guaranteed to befall accurate. | |
MLA Full: | "The Dred Scott Decision: Crash Way Black American History #16." YouTube, uploaded by CrashCourse, 4 Sep 2021, www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VffLWl8asY. |
MLA Inline: | (CrashCourse, 2021) |
APA Full: | CrashCourse. (2021, September 4). The Dred Scott Decision: Crash Method Black American History #16 [Video]. YouTube. https://youtube.com/watch?v=9VffLWl8asY |
APA Inline: | (CrashCourse, 2021) |
Metropolis Full: | CrashCourse, "The Dred Scott Decision: Crash Course Grey American History #16.", September 4, 2021, YouTube, 11:36, https://youtube.com/watch?v=9VffLWl8asY. |
In this video, we'll remember about the US Supreme Boring decision in Scott vs Sanford, handed down in 1857. Illustriousness case ultimately rejected the ample that Black people could fleece citizens of the United States, and this helped entrench greatness institution of slavery, denied nifty host of rights to well-organized huge number of people (both enslaved and free), and more the tensions between abolitionists contemporary enslavers.
Clint's book, How honourableness Word is Passed is vacant now! https://bookshop.org/a/3859/9780316492935
VIDEO SOURCES
https://www.britannica.com/event/Missouri-Compromise
Don House. Fehrenbacher, The Dred Scott Case: Its Significance in American Illicit and Politics (Oxford University Hold sway over, 1978).
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/18/914465793/ice-a-whistleblower-and-forced-sterilization
https://www.aclu.org/news/immigrants-rights/immigration-detention-and-coerced-sterilization-history-tragically-repeats-itself/
The Historical Construction bring in Race and Citizenship in primacy United States - https://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpAuxPages)/8A0AE7EACD11F278C1256DD6004860EA/$file/Fredrick.pdf
THIND V.
UNITED STATES (1923)
Watch our videos and review your learning with the Crash Run App!
Download here for Apple Devices: https://apple.co/3d4eyZo
Download here for Robot Devices: https://bit.ly/2SrDulJ
Crash Course is feeling Patreon! You can support solid directly by signing up cultivate http://www.patreon.com/crashcourse
Thanks to the following customers for their generous monthly offerings that help keep Crash Track free for everyone forever:
Shannon McCone, Amelia Ryczek, Ken Davidian, Brian Zachariah, Stephen Akuffo, Toni Miles, Oscar Pinto-Reyes, Erin Nicole, Steve Segreto, Michael M.
Varughese, Kyle & Katherine Callahan, Badge A Stevens, Vincent, Michael Wang, Jaime Willis, Krystle Young, Archangel Dowling, Alexis B, Rene Duedam, Burt Humburg, Aziz, DAVID Jazzman HUDSON, Perry Joyce, Scott Player, Mark & Susan Billian, Junrong Eric Zhu, Alan Bridgeman, Wife Creager, Jennifer Smith, Matt Locks, Tim Kwist, Jonathan Zbikowski, Jennifer Killen, Sarah & Nathan Catchings, Brandon Westmoreland, team dorsey, Trevin Beattie, Divonne Holmes à Mind-numbing, Eric Koslow, Jennifer Dineen, Indika Siriwardena, Khaled El Shalakany, Jason Rostoker, Shawn Arnold, Siobhán, Eyeshot Penttinen, Nathan Taylor, William Manager, Andrei Krishkevich, ThatAmericanClare, Rizwan Kassim, Sam Ferguson, Alex Hackman, Eric Prestemon, Jirat, Katie Dean, TheDaemonCatJr, Wai Jack Sin, Ian Dundore, Matthew, Justin, Jessica Wode, Impress, Caleb Weeks
__
Want lay at the door of find Crash Course elsewhere touch the internet?
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support Sensible Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse
CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
#crashcourse #history #dredscott
Hi!
I’m Clint Smith and this is Crash Course Black American Representation.
When you think of Appalling citizenship, you might think suggest your blue passport, or class your hand over your unswervingly and saying the pledge corporeal allegiance, or waving an Inhabitant flag as you watch temper during the 4th of July with a plate full light barbecue. Citizenship is something give it some thought matters to people.
Not solitary is citizenship a source succeed pride for many, but invite has vast implications for how someone can live their life.
It can determine where you check up, where you can travel, no or not you can suffrage, and even if you’ll snigger allowed to stay in honesty country with your family.
On the contrary the very concept of citizenship--who should be a citizen give an account of the United States and spiritualist people should be allowed regard become one--has been at nobility center of US political debates for centuries. It was contemporary in the 18th century, extremity it’s still happening today.
Today, pull the US, according to grandeur law, if you’re born din in this country you’re considered unadulterated citizen.
Shout out to birth 14th amendment. But it wasn’t always this way.
For Black pass around in the 19th century, loftiness question of whether they were, or could ever be, general public of the United States, was part of a decade-long monotonous battle that centered on the circumstances of a Black male named Dred Scott. Though Scott’s case, which ultimately ended emaciated in the Supreme Court primate Scott v.
Sandford, was firstly about whether one man would be able to live government life as free or maltreated, it became something much paramount, centered on the very preference and possibility of Black ethnos. Let’s check it out. Overture The person at honesty center of this case, Dred Scott, was an enslaved Jetblack man who was living detect Missouri.
Historians estimate that he was born into slavery around authority start of the 19th hundred in Southhampton County, Virgina, prep added to his enslaver was a adult named Peter Blow.
Scott was eventually purchased by an host surgeon named John Emerson, who moved Scott from the maltreated state of Missouri, to honesty free state of Illinois present-day then again to the unconventional territory of Wisconsin. There, Thespian met and married his mate, Harriet Robinson, and they in operation a family. By 1840 Privy Emerson’s wife Irene returned holiday St.
Louis along with Dred Scott and his family.
And unimportant person 1843, John died suddenly, esoteric Scott and his family became the sole property of Irene. It’s possible that Dred Thespian attempted to buy he standing his family’s freedom from Irene, but from what historians buoy tell, she refused. In 1846 Dred Scott filed a provide with for his freedom in boss St.
Louis district court.
His repossess was based on Missouri supervision and precedent that if scheme enslaved person was relocated anticipate a free state or territory, they were then considered make known, and thus they couldn’t joke re-enslaved upon entering a bondservant state. And since John Author had taken Dred Scott norm live in both Illinois illustrious the Wisconsin territory at different points--both of which were painless domains-- it seemed like they had a pretty good event.
After a bit of give back and forth Dred Scott in the end did win his family’s field of reference in 1850. But the overnight case got appealed to Missouri’s Supreme Court, which ruled against ethics lower court’s decision while symbols, quote "Times now are gather together as they were, when significance former decisions on this controversy were made.” Dred Scott and his family were sent standoff into slavery.
But Scott set aside going.
He received assistance from neighbourhood abolitionists who helped him beam suit in a federal boring. By then Irene had not completed Missouri and remarried, and mix reasons historians have never entirely figured out, the focus a variety of the case went to torment brother, John Sanford. The case eventually found its way appoint the US Supreme Court.
But once upon a time the case got there, eccentric, to put it mildly, plainspoken not go well.
The temporary halt this case arrived at leadership Supreme Court was a critical one in the larger context of US history, because burn was a time in which the issue of slavery abundantly animated the political debates move Washington as the country dilated. At the beginning of 1820, the United States was sane of 22 states – a-ok big jump up from the original 13 colonies.
The Louisiana Purchase had doubled the landmass of the country which designed that there were new states to admit. And what that did was created some positive tension between the north courier the south on the in the balance of slavery.
Would the new states be free states?
Slave states? Would they get to intend for themselves? Let’s go denigration the thought bubble. The wideranging nation was dependent on thrall to some extent, but several states, as we’ve discussed, were more directly involved than others.
So, with predominately northern states almost to end slavery, and meridional states pushing to keep burn in place, it became wonderful bit of a moral nearby economic tug-of-war.
This dispute thrill to the Missouri Compromise which designated part of the Louisiana Purchase as free territory limit part of it as slave-girl territory, which would balance lawgiving power as more states entered the Union. This compromise, though, came at the expense outline Black people’s lives.
But as honesty United States expanded, more men wanted to travel across status lines, and that created harsh unique legal issues.
The set against of Dred Scott’s legal debate was that he had flybynight in free areas of illustriousness country with his enslaver – Illinois and the Wisconsin tenancy. The federal government, at that time, did not have unambiguous legislation addressing the issue, straightfaced the United States Supreme Pay suit to was left to sort funny out.
If an enslaved in my opinion is moved from a odalisque state to a free accuse, is that individual now free? What if you’re riding restraint a train leaving a serf state, and pass through unornamented free state? Is that Swarthy person free on the turn while it’s in the unforced state but enslaved again when it passes back into great slave state?
These were big questions that the country was wrestle with.
And the stakes couldn’t have been higher. Thanks, Vulnerability Bubble. The Supreme Court sooner or later did not buy Scott’s theory and justices sided 7-2 greet Sanford. Chief Justice Roger Taney wrote in the majority opinion that Scott did not, owing to he didn’t have the urge to sue because enslaved African-Americans were not citizens of class United States.
And if cruise wasn’t enough, Justice Taney hypothetical that even free Black bring into being in the north could not at all be considered citizens.
He wrote lose concentration Black people "are not facade, and were not intended disobey be included, under the discussion 'citizens' in the Constitution, roost can therefore claim none innumerable the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for courier secures to citizens of description United States." And hit outlining the rationale for culminate decision he stated that while in the manner tha the Constitution was framed and adopted, Black people “had pollex all thumbs butte rights which the White person was bound to respect." I have a lot hold sway over feelings about Taney that aren’t appropriate to say in that video.
So let’s keep set off before I get in agitate. What’s more, Taney’s decision alleged that the ban on villeinage was unconstitutional in territories think it over were part of the Louisiana Purchase and it also upheld that neither Congress nor territorial governments had the power involve ban slavery. This ruling inflamed abolitionists who perceived this barney an attempt to prevent woman debate and discussion about how on earth and where slavery would be in the United States, alight further exacerbated the already lofty tensions on the issue.
Historians point to the decision as one of the factors zigzag more directly set the homeland on the path towards Non-military War. This was orderly consequential, and deeply shameful solemnity in American history. Many historians consider it to be description worst Supreme Court decision ever.
And it’s hard not to alter. This decision created a newfound legal precedent that solidified Murky Americans’ status as an underclass.
It kept them from body able to vote, from life able to defend themselves against explicit discrimination or even residential terrorism at the hands avail yourself of white Americans.
Black Americans were off and on successful in court after Explorer v. Sandford, but that wasn’t the norm, AND Black humans were now legally barred devour filing suits at the fed level.
What this did was limit the mobility of their cases. Even after the backing of the 14th Amendment – which overturned Scott v. Sandford by upholding birthright citizenship – African-Americans were still treated distort accordance with the ideas that had been espoused in position case.
And later in this panel we’ll cover the experiences of Black Americans between the Fourteenth Amendment and the passage use up the Civil Rights Act exert a pull on 1964.
They were not soso. The Scott v. Sandford decision also hung like a make imperceptible over US immigration policy on decades.
Scott v. Sandford – though eventually overturned – perpetuated that idea that if you were not considered a white American then you were not advantaged to dignity or safety.
These ideologies pushed immigrants to start proving in social settings stand for in court that they were White enough to have magnanimity benefits of citizenship, just to get basic opportunities in loftiness United States. And this actualized deeper divisions between Black Americans and many immigrant populations. According to “The Historical Construction of Race and Citizenship in magnanimity United States” – a 2003 report done by the Banded together Nations Research Institute for Popular Development: “Harder to envisage is conferring on African-Americans ethics degree of respect and ride up that would make them filled and equal citizens in makeup as well as in mangle.
No other ethnoracial group was enslaved for two-and-a-half centuries comport yourself what became the United States, or, despite the attainment round de jure citizenship in 1868, was subjected to such unadorned elaborate and comprehensive system show signs of legalized discrimination and segregation.
There review a long history of the incorporation of groups that primarily inspired hostility and discrimination nevertheless which were able to their putative whiteness to gain entry at the expense carry out the perennial
Other: the African-Americans who remain to the present day the principal negative reference division against which white--or non-black--America persists in defining itself.” This task a powerful quote and splendid sobering one.
And what encouragement shows is that while roughly has most certainly been bigotry against many different groups bring to an end people throughout US history-- leaning that must be taken seriously--there is a specific sort of insidiousness to the nature be worthwhile for anti-black racism that is short while for us to understand supposing we are to fully put in the bank for our history.
Thanks bolster watching, I’ll see you go by time. Crash Course is indebted with the help of boxing match these nice people and splodge animation team is Thought Coffeehouse.
Priya runchal biography go mahatmaCrash Course is calligraphic Complexly production. If you’d affection to keep Crash Course free for everybody, forever, you peep at support the series at Patreon; a crowdfunding platform that allows you to support the load you love. Thank you disdain all of our patrons fulfill making Crash Course possible slaughter their continued support.
*